| |  | |
 | |
|
| ... |
|
The
armoured truck of the jungle, the Asian Rhinoceros is the largest and most powerful
animal on land with the exception of the Elephant. It is usually about nine feet
in length, and this is also nearly the girth of its body. The rhinoceros is a
quiet and inoffensive animal, but when attacked or provoked it becomes livid and
dangerous and he is even sometimes subject to paroxysms of fury, which nothing
can ease. All
three Asiatic species of rhinos were found in different parts of West Bengal.
The smaller one-horned or the Javan Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros sondaicus Desmarest)
was found in the Sunderban mangrove forests about a century back and was extinct
by 1900. The Asiatic two-horned or Sumatran Rhinoceros (Didermocerus sumatrensis
Fisher) was found in the plains of North Bengal till about 1930. The Great Indian
One-horned Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis Linnaeus) is known to have once been
extremely common and widespread in the Indo-Gengetic plains of the north, central
and south-eastern part of the state. By the end of the 17th century it had completely
disappeared from much of the range.
| The
rhino horn is not
an aphrodisiac | |
The
great one-horned rhinoceros is now confined, as small populations, in two PAs
(Protected Areas), Gorumara National Park (70 sq.km) and Jaldapara Sanctuary (217
sq.km) the in North Bengal plains in habitats of riparian grasslands, shallow
and dense woodlands. There are 19
animals at Gorumara and 48 at Jaldapara as per 1998 census. Rhinos
have been killed for the horn, which is wrongly believed to have aphrodisiac properties.
Poachers killed 28 rhinos during the period 1968-72. Intense anti-poaching measures
reduced the killing spree, but there have been occasional spurts. During 1981-85,
poachers killed 9 rhinos. However, poaching has been contained and only 3 cases
were recorded during 1994-98. Habitat shrinkages has also led to population loss.
This is caused by floods, invasion of grasslands by woody species and pernicious
weeds and incendiary fires. Click
for a rhino
distribution map...
Anti-poaching
measures have been intensified by regular patrolling, constitution of special
protection for strengthening communication networks, provision of better arms
for staff, coordination of law enforcement agencies, incentives and rewards, publicity/nature
education/awareness generation and eco-development activities for fringe villages.
Habitat improvement works
are initiated by canopy manipulation in woodlands with planting of indigenous
fodder grasses, weed eradication, control burning and fire control, grazing control
of domestic livestock and flood embankment protection works and soil moisture
conservation works. Conservation biologists are charged with elucidating
the factors affecting the persistence and evolutionary potential of populations.
It has now been well illustrated that environmental heterogeneity and migration
can maintain genetic variability in natural populations. The fragmentation of
habitats by human activities, however, often prevents migrations and genetic exchange
among populations. As a consequence, local population become isolated and cause
"inbreeding". Inbreeding and the
resulting loss of the genetic variability are often inevitable consequences of
the severe reduction in population size experienced by endangered species, but
the extent to which this results in inbreeding depression is likely to vary tremendously
and is difficult to document in wild population. The population may, finally,
become highly endangered through the loss of genetic adaptability.
Nevertheless,
a primary goal of conservation efforts has been to preserve a maximum amount of
genetic variation in each species.
The Wildlife Wing of the Govt. of West Bengal in collaboration with the Wildlife
Institute of India, Dehradun and the National Institute of Immunology,New Delhi,
therefore, undertook a study for genetic finger-printing of rhino population distributed
within this state. The
surviving population in West Bengal in two pockets have become isolated since
no habitat corridor exists between these two Protected Areas. The absence of any
likelihood of
| …2-horned
rhino roamed the Sundarbans
till 1930… |
|
infusion of the newer genetic materials into the already confined gene pool, insurmountable
biotic pressure and ever-growing habitat encroachment have become cause of concern.
In view of this precarious scenario,
information on the genetic diversity is needed to address issues related to management
and conservation of this highly endangered species. In order to gain an insight
into the organisational aspects of the genome, a study on the DNA sequence variability
within and between the rhino species was undertaken. It is envisaged that a detailed
understanding on genetic variability would greatly facilitate the effective conservation
of this species. The resultant information would also enable to compare rhino
genomes from Gorumara and Jaldapara and later even from other parts of the world.
The purpose of the present study was to establish the pattern and extent of genetic
variation at the DNA sequence level among the rhino population in West Bengal
using conventional DNA profiling and AP-PCR mediated approaches. Further, it was
aimed to develop species specific DNA probe so that the same may be used for ascertaining
the origin of tissues, bone or horn samples in forensic or poaching cases. Important
conclusions drawn from the present preliminary genetic study wherein the collection
of blood and tissue samples through chemical immobilaztion ans skin biopsy technique
were integral and inevitable are stated below: The
chemical immobilization of two captive and six free ranging Rhinos was successfully
carried out. The combination of etorphine and acepromazine maleate(Immoblion)
is a drug choice since it has a wide safety margin, short induction time and rapid
reversibility. Each animal immobilized was photographed, hence a complete set
of sequential pictures on chemical immobilization and animal handling is now available.
This is one of the significant outcome of the study and would have immense educational
and training utility.
Well
demonstrated skin biopsy technique on other free ranging animals including the
Asian Wild Buffalo in Assam did not work on Rhinos in spite of few trials were
made, both on captive as well as wild animals. In each trial the dart bounced
off without collecting the samples and dart got distorted. Hence, the technique
needs further experimental trials and refinement of the biopsy dart since this
technique can be of great help where immobilization of endangered animals is difficult,
tedious and also risky.
Aware
of the fact that the sample size was very small and limited only to one PA in
West Bengal, it is difficult to conclusively demonstrate a clear picture about
the genetic status of Rhinos in West Bengal and their relationships with other
populations. However, the preliminary findings revealed high level of genetic
homogeneity in the Rhino population though several approaches were used simultaneously.
At this juncture, it is not possible to corroborate actual situation of the inbreeding
depressi A
cloned probe pSS(R)2 has been developed. This is one of the significant achievements
of the present study. The total sequences of the clone have been deposited in
the GENE BANK. This probe is species specific and may successfully be used for
ascertaining the origin of tissue, blood,horn,hoof or skin samples from the Rhino
genome With
respect to effective management and conservation of Rhinoceros unicornis in the
two PAs in West Bengal, it becomes necessary to supplement wild or captive populations
with individuals from a different conservation unit in order to avoid likely inbreeding
depression. The appropriate strategies would required to be evolved for infusion
of genetic materials into the confined gene pool. |